Strandhogg: An Important Finding To Combat Contemporary Vulnerability

Waseem Jalal

According to researchers, attackers may execute complex malware attacks using the StrandHogg vulnerability without having to root an Android smartphone. Attackers allegedly exploit the operating system control parameter “taskAffinity” to initiate their attacks. The “taskAffinity” feature allows a program to take on the identity of any operating system. 

A publicly available Android vulnerability is now being used by malicious applications. This vulnerability may allow login credentials and financial information to be taken from the device user. Android security experts have found that a virus may overlay a phony user interface on top of the legitimate software when an application is loaded on a user’s smartphone. This might give users the impression that they are utilizing genuine software. 

Using this kind of attack to support “privilege escalation,” a malicious program may deceive users into granting access to features that are often forbidden, such as text messaging, location data, phone calls, or the device camera.

  • Identifying Attacks by Strand Hogg

Researchers assert that it is challenging for typical users to recognize and evade the attack because of the need forneed for effective detection and blocking methods. They assert that a user of one of the targeted devices can see many anomalies, such as an application prompting them to check in when they have already done so. When consumers get strange requests from programs that don’t really need to know such information, the researchers encourage them to proceed cautiously. Additionally, when there are grammatical or spelling errors, caution should be used.

The in-depth study on task hijacking by university academics claims that the operating system allows activities from several programs to co-exist within the same task, enabling users to schedule sessions and switch between apps efficientlyto schedule sessions and switch between apps efficiently.

The survey discovered that Android consumers exclusively download applications from well-known developers. It is recommended that the user quit an app after using it rather than going straight back to the home screen. While not infallible, this method works well to lessen the  Strandhogg attack. The researchers encourage knowledgeable users—especially those working in the business sector—to do the adb shell dumpsys activity using a USB drive. This activity generates an exhaustive list of all ongoing activities along with the apps that go with them. Users who are educated about the subject may identify any potentially illicit conduct thanks to this feature.

The researchers assert that some fundamental task data is available to app developers via the Android SDK. If the jobs are not running in the forefront, the developers may not be able to do this. As a result, the software could be compromised even if it is not currently executing. Since Android does not have a mechanism for informing developers of such instances, it is essential that developers have access to a background monitoring service in order to recognize hijacked jobs. 

Based on the findings of the study, it is advised that the developer of a valid application set all activities’ task affinity to ” or an empty string in the AndroidManifest.xml application tag. This will suggest that the operations of the harmless program have nothing to do with any specific job. But this can only lessen the risk to a certain degree.

Using a mobile application security layer like AppSealing is recommended to safeguard Android devices from security issues such as StrandHogg. This kind of security software provides protection against attacks that hijack programs while they are operating.

  • Cryptographic Apps and iOS Devices Are Affected.

Even though Android’s security has been compromised, iOS is also not faring much better. In the first part of this year, a limited number of compromised websites were found by Google’s Threat Analysis Group (TAG). The compromised websites were utilized in targeted watering hole attacks on its users by making use of an iPhone 0-day vulnerability. Five distinct, comprehensive, and exclusive iPhone exploit chains that span almost all iOS 10 to iOS 12 versions were successfully obtained by the TAG team. This demonstrates that a certain entity has been persistently attempting to jeopardize the security of iPhone users in specific locations for at least two years.

More significant problems arise from the fact that other software contains vulnerabilities comparable to the StrandHogg vulnerability. In recent months, a number of smartphone applications have been found that aim to gather money illicitly, including cryptocurrency collections. Malware programs that target personal computers have also been discovered. As the value of blockchain assets increases, additional assets may surface. As of yet, no concrete cases of Bitcoin losses connected to StrandHogg have been documented. However, because of the system’s decentralized nature, it’s likely that thefts should have been noticed or correctly attributed.

  • How Does the StrandHogg Vulnerability Work?

The research findings indicate that StrandHogg is a vulnerability that occurs during multitasking, particularly when a user is transitioning between tasks or processes for different programs or operations. The Android operating system uses a technique called “task re-parenting” to allocate processing power to the application that is now active on the screen. The StrandHogg vulnerability exploits a technique known as “task re-parenting” to insert malicious code into a legitimate app when a user presses on it. It is doubtful that a user would be aware of the program’s existence since the researchers claim to have seen its hidden usage.

Sources claim that this vulnerability was compatible with all Android OS versions and that it just required the minimal amount of permissions required by approved applications. Furthermore, root access to the device was optional. 

According to the researchers, there is concrete proof that attackers have used this vulnerability to do serious harm, most notably to a mobile banking user in one instance. It is evident that any security measures used by the targeted banking application may be defeated if the attacker has access to the victim’s banking credentials and intercepts any SMS-based two-factor authentication codes.

Here are the general workings of this exploit, which the article will have to exclude. Assume, for the sake of this, that the attacker wishes to get the user’s Gmail login.

  • Naturally, the consumer installs and starts a malicious program without realizing it is dangerous.
  • The application loads Gmail in the background, overlays a fake login Activity, and then starts another Activity.
  • When the user opens Gmail, they see what seems to be the login page, but it’s really a phishing attempt by the attacker.

In summary

Attacks using screen overlays, which target financial applications, have greatly expanded in the last several years. The Trojans often use a fictitious login page that is embedded in the genuine banking software to coerce users into divulging their passwords and other personally identifiable information for their banking apps. This also applies to the StrandHogg vulnerability. It is crucial to remember that StrandHogg gives users of Android banking and Bitcoin a significant danger since it makes it possible for dishonest individuals to have unauthorized access to wallets and other private information.

Leave a Comment